To test each drive we ran 6 test runs per device (1,4,16,64,128,256 queue depth) each test having 8 parts, each part lasting 10 min w/ an additional 20 second ramp up. The 6 subparts were set to run 100% random, 75% read 25% write; testing 512b, 4k,8k,16k,32k,64k size chunks of data. When each test is finished IOMeter spits out a report, in that reports each of the 6 subtests are given a score in I/Os per second. We then take these 8 numbers add them together and divide by 6. This gives us an average score for that particular queue depth that is heavily weighted for file server usage.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/839bb/839bba65e9959f0f4d021de002b584fe7332cf41" alt="Crucial MX300 275GB Quad Raid 0 18 Crucial MX300 275GB Quad Raid 0 13"
This is the first MX300 that would actually recommend for workstation duty… but only when dealing with RAID 0 with four drives. On its own it really is a rather poor performer… just like any small budget SSD. So choose wisely when making your decision on how you spend your money.